Kia ora, thanks very much for the opportunity to present in person to the annual plan. I put a longer submission in, but I just wanted to speak tonight very briefly to the proposal in the plan to increase the fees for the mooring holders and the boat shed lessees in the Clyde Quay boat harbour in line with the Evans Bay Marina. And this essential submission that I wanted to present to answer was that these facilities can't be compared in any way except for the fact that boats are kept there. Um, there's actually— the proposal is not consistent with the broader annual plan, that there's a miscategorization of the, um, of the boat harbour. And thirdly, that, uh, the nature of the boat harbour is part of the, the city's spirit and part of the city's heritage, and that increasing the fees in the way that's proposed really is discouraging and pushing away people who use the boat harbour as part of the character of the city. So just maybe enlarging on those, those first few points, um, the boat harbour, unlike the marina, really provides no amenity to the boat holders there. So there's no ablution facilities, there's no security, it's not possible to live aboard. Also, the boat harbour itself isn't dredged, so for a number of the boats in the boat harbour, even some of the facilities that are provided like the breastwork are not accessible. So the substantial difference also extends to the fact that the The mooring lessees need to maintain their own moorings, so they're not actually council moorings. All the people get for their money is essentially space to put a boat in the water. All the costs fall back on the, the boat holders. In terms of the, the more technical submission, the annual plan proposal aligns the harbour and the Evans Bay Marina together, but actually In line with the substantive difference that I've just talked about, the Council Zone Plan talks about waterfront space, and it talks about heritage areas, and it talks about public places. All of those things are what the Boat Harbour is. It's recognised in the Council Zone Plan as a heritage area, and the funding, uh, the funding equations for those areas are different. So the marina is expected to be 100% fees recovery. I can understand that, but heritage areas, waterfront space, and public places are funded through general rates to 100%. So actually, my argument is that the council and the proposal has misclassified the boat harbour, um, as a marina, when actually it is recognised by the council as a heritage area, and that includes the boat sheds which are included in the proposal. I'm not suggesting that those who enjoy the benefits of access to the boat harbour and sheds don't pay some kind of reasonable fee. That's fine, I've been paying fees for a number of years, but the magnitude of the increase is starting to get to the point where you think the amenity level isn't warranted by the cost that's being imposed, and actually, do you leave the boat harbour, and with that, do you actually start to degrade some of the community the broader civic community. And that really just relates to the third point, which is it is a community down there. We're all part of that community. We do contribute into the harbour in all kinds of ways, and I think it will be a loss both for the sailing club that I'm a part of but also for the wider public to not have that facility populated in the same way. So that's really the That's all the submissions. Happy to take any questions.